Click here to read more! The real truth is that out entire law is based on the belief in fairness and this includes the orphan who may have had to eat rats on a ship on the way to Ellis Island. It covers the orphans in the East end of London today and in Dickens' age. The point is that when you read Dickens or Shakespeare or Tom Sawyer's tales, you are asked to make a personal judgement about the world, about others, about authority, human and also your self as an actor and participant in this world. It involves you; the story. This is not unlike the average wife and husband experience at a Coffee shop in public or what may transpire in public and the Court does its best to be fair to the parties. Did the husband throw the shovel at the wife or did he throw a shovel during a conversation that landed 20 feet away? This question involves a situation of potential violence and husbands and wives do argue. But, what should happen if no violence actually transpired but the authorities were involved; the police I mean to say or the cops. Batman knows! We really dislike anyone who is a super hero but we like super hero movies and what happened to you lest any citizen should intervene before the police arrive to re attach your head at the back of the train running from Paris to....India?
Click here to read more! The real truth is that out entire law is based on the belief in fairness and this includes the orphan who may have had to eat rats on a ship on the way to Ellis Island. It covers the orphans in the East end of London today and in Dickens' age. The point is that when you read Dickens or Shakespeare or Tom Sawyer's tales, you are asked to make a personal judgement about the world, about others, about authority, human and also your self as an actor and participant in this world. It involves you; the story. This is not unlike the average wife and husband experience at a Coffee shop in public or what may transpire in public and the Court does its best to be fair to the parties. Did the husband throw the shovel at the wife or did he throw a shovel during a conversation that landed 20 feet away? This question involves a situation of potential violence and husbands and wives do argue. But, what should happen if no violence actually transpired but the authorities were involved; the police I mean to say or the cops. Batman knows! We really dislike anyone who is a super hero but we like super hero movies and what happened to you lest any citizen should intervene before the police arrive to re attach your head at the back of the train running from Paris to....India? The point is there is an expectation to respect people regardless of culture and ancestry but it seems cultural expectations from various parts of the world hope to impregnate our society with a burden of historical guilt but also with this guilt of our former imperialism, this western culture is supposed to just hand the keys to any new arrival from Astelouego or Arizonaifstan or Chinoispines or Venezuyana so that they might have authority that they never had before in their power to accuse people on the basis of how they feel from their cultural stand point about people with education that gives the said accusatory victim the feeling of authority that is disdained by many of these new arrivals and then Mr. Venezuyana is supposed to see his justice from his point of view as the innocent freckle faced, pocket sized bible carrying and retired police officer is taken away for threatening or a public disturbance when he asked someone back up his vehicle as it was touching the back bumper of his gloried Mustang; Hallelujah! The point is how can you sing Hallelujah when something array is taking place and someone is trying to get out of a parking lot and he is wrongfully accused ? I think the Venezuyanian was born in Eastern Europe and has the right accent but concocted similar stories about subway passengers who tried to get directions as they were lost on the way to a Yorkton University but ended up at South York station by mistake although Yorkton was not too far away and the passenger wanted to look around to see if he was lost and maybe he was while all educated passengers look a like; that Parenthetic Fahrenheit 451 reader who is trying, in all his getting to get understanding. If he was lost in any the wrong direction, he should be able to get back on the system even if you have those really cool subway(underground tube) gates like in London; innit? You tell the subway collector you made the mistake while you bought a coke on your journey to refresh yourself since coke is the real thing and Santa Claus on the can once a year and we thank God. With this being the case and with the coke in hand, the subway collector lets you back in since the value of a human being is more than a bottle of coke or the £1.50 or $1.50 that it costs to run into people with personal agendas as targeting members of the public while in a publicly funded job. He is your employee really and should be courteous when you ask him for directions and if he cannot say where Yorkton is, then he should be happy that you might try and ask someone else. The system is not closed to people who get lost or end up at the wrong stop and who buy his Almond Joy on the way back to the right station.
The accusation in any situation is not evidence but an accusation and no woman is presumptively right nor can any human being regardless of the facts with a European accent be right presumptively in Europe or in North America since this is not our culture but if it is European woman with a European accent, then maybe.
In situations involving accusations with no other real evidence, you have what is called a competing set of oaths. But, if there is no real evidence then it is very difficult to maintain the file before Court. The hope of any Cop investigating the situation is to collate all the evidence available and then leave it to the Court to decide with defense Counsel as an Officer of the Court to assist the Police Officer who is also an Officer of the Court in seeing the Court address the evidence. It is not for the Judge to read the file but if he did, he might be able to, as in student in an exam room would have to during professional training, see that all the witnesses are conflicted or that they corroborate the testimony of the alleged victim where she says it never did really fall of the table or the shovel never did hit her but it was thrown in the air. Further to this, the witnesses may confirm that her account was communicated to them as a dream that she had once and when she woke up the window on the 10th floor was open but her her socks whereas rolled down but not off. In any case, the story is conflicted and inconsistent from all accounts and the testimony of the accused confirms the same. He has nothing to say since the notes of the accusing witness confirm the account; that nothing happened.
The end result, if the Judge read the file on his own, would be that there is no reasonable prospect of conviction and I am not sure what else a Bar ads program is supposed to train an already three year legal initiate to figure out but if he has not figured it out after his licensing process as a Guardian of the Court, then he can come to Angel Ronan(TM) which is on sale for $100.00 so that Wallen Santo Lyono can run Angel Patrick(TM). His real name is....let me google the website at www.angelronan.blogspot.ca and see his name...I think he went to a High School for 4 years with a predominantly immigrant population in some place north of Highway 48 or...some other place; 60 percent immigrant school population in 19...Let's see. I think he's...what does the photo say on the wesbite..maybe Afroeurasian. They used to say Black!!!!! Yes; Black!!! But, Afroeurasian is good enough and it does not affect the quality of his actual Canadian Law written exam results; innit mate?
Anyway, the issue is that the Court's integrity is to be honored and with all the facts, you must choose how you will honor this Court. It is strategy and maybe being humble is to take your client to the greater moment of your glory where the assessment of proof beyond reasonable doubt is brought into a limbo of fuzziness while our law from the outset is quite clear. The file in terms of evidence is closed on the day of the issue of the information as sworn. A preliminary Inquiry is forestalled from being a fishing expedition and cannot be used as such. This is a travesty while there is also no room to add to the file while the witness or accuser may be brought to the stand to give account to her accusation. Then, the evidence is assessed and any new evidence would have to be conflicting and contradictory with no probative value. The assessment during this Preliminary Inquiry or Deposition is to assess the fitness of the evidence for untrained triers of Fact known as the jury who will be asked whether they believe there is any finding of guilt in the consideration of the reasonable man in the criminal law, not in the Tort law, such that the accused's circumstances are considered in this assessment with the reasonable 5' 1'' Ethiopian taxi driver with an air gun who thought he was going to be robbed by rowdy and celebrating 6'8'' tall 10th generation Black High School or College basketball players and he just turns around and shoot everyone of them in the head while driving his Uber Honda on an arranged pick up. But where one is involved as a trier of fact in the criminal context , they must always ask themselves in assessing the behavior of the reasonable , just what the accused in the alleged circumstances would have considered the facts to be from his vantage point at 5' 3 '' tall as a former prisoner of an African dictator whose wife wants to believe that apostolic-ally, the soap on your bathroom counter has to be what she imagines as expensive white people uh milk! Ah ah...don't you know he will accuse you before you can save him from his own lack of de good credibility...don't you know? The tortious standard of the reasonable man does not assess the subjective outlook of the accused tortfeasor but a standard of reasonableness must be applied that is brought from the professional standards and expectations of a professional body or a standard understood to be that of the reasonably capable driver or pedestrian like Malfloata where a legal obligation to obey traffic by laws may also be relevant in assessing this reasonableness such that it would never be reasonable to cross the road where the cross walk is malfunctioning at night but it would have been reasonable to walk to the lights only 3 minutes away if you reasonably considered the value of your life on a snowy wet winter, cold and dark night where the lights were known to have been dysfunctional. You say 'What about Television and the 'Suits' TV show or what about Matlock?' But, Matlock's director knows the answer while Matlock is just a television character. The show was not designed for your salvation although there is a law that preserves your Habeus Corpus rights in spite of your belief in the power of the Punch and the bicep over the law but your current inability to remember that you have no right to harass anyone for his legal or library service and intellectual property that he not only defends as owned by him but also the intellectual property of others. He also creates and sells intellectual property as there is a law for your benefit and you will be glad that there are people who can insist on these laws for your big boy, Brock Lesknife benefit when you do forget although this mob psychology toward harassment has to be drug induced. No matter what, when it comes to systems of energy, rail roads, roads, engines and bridges in addition to law and economics , you will be students forever in certain parts of the world where the hot and cold Moen faucet showed up in the year 1500 on your Western Hemispheric Amerindian shores and once you had an African Dark Chocolate Truffle or a Black Burberry MAC, you can't go back and even so it does not forestall the right to be creative and redistributive which has its limits since it cannot cater to your belief in the right to do what you have to do to temper your feelings of jealousy after High School(you were right to get the social authority and Crown of Glory of an always brand new vehicle as a car sales man; Bling!That is what you wanted! ) with an understanding of certain immutable and final results that can never change lest the entire system is rendered redundant and unsafe to the point of no longer being habitable with negative population growth purely for economic reasons and also legal and lawless reasons. Law is not a human being's name. The initials LAW are not a symbol of Euro occupation or dominance. No; it is about you and your safety in any culture even if the entire country was a native reserve. It is law for personal safety and the safety of all property that includes native property.
This was written in honor of Brock Lesknife and his power to defend against a punch to his personal property and personal safety by calling 911. Warren did and they killed all the trespassers at his home in an on going investigation!
The accusation in any situation is not evidence but an accusation and no woman is presumptively right nor can any human being regardless of the facts with a European accent be right presumptively in Europe or in North America since this is not our culture but if it is European woman with a European accent, then maybe.
In situations involving accusations with no other real evidence, you have what is called a competing set of oaths. But, if there is no real evidence then it is very difficult to maintain the file before Court. The hope of any Cop investigating the situation is to collate all the evidence available and then leave it to the Court to decide with defense Counsel as an Officer of the Court to assist the Police Officer who is also an Officer of the Court in seeing the Court address the evidence. It is not for the Judge to read the file but if he did, he might be able to, as in student in an exam room would have to during professional training, see that all the witnesses are conflicted or that they corroborate the testimony of the alleged victim where she says it never did really fall of the table or the shovel never did hit her but it was thrown in the air. Further to this, the witnesses may confirm that her account was communicated to them as a dream that she had once and when she woke up the window on the 10th floor was open but her her socks whereas rolled down but not off. In any case, the story is conflicted and inconsistent from all accounts and the testimony of the accused confirms the same. He has nothing to say since the notes of the accusing witness confirm the account; that nothing happened.
The end result, if the Judge read the file on his own, would be that there is no reasonable prospect of conviction and I am not sure what else a Bar ads program is supposed to train an already three year legal initiate to figure out but if he has not figured it out after his licensing process as a Guardian of the Court, then he can come to Angel Ronan(TM) which is on sale for $100.00 so that Wallen Santo Lyono can run Angel Patrick(TM). His real name is....let me google the website at www.angelronan.blogspot.ca and see his name...I think he went to a High School for 4 years with a predominantly immigrant population in some place north of Highway 48 or...some other place; 60 percent immigrant school population in 19...Let's see. I think he's...what does the photo say on the wesbite..maybe Afroeurasian. They used to say Black!!!!! Yes; Black!!! But, Afroeurasian is good enough and it does not affect the quality of his actual Canadian Law written exam results; innit mate?
Anyway, the issue is that the Court's integrity is to be honored and with all the facts, you must choose how you will honor this Court. It is strategy and maybe being humble is to take your client to the greater moment of your glory where the assessment of proof beyond reasonable doubt is brought into a limbo of fuzziness while our law from the outset is quite clear. The file in terms of evidence is closed on the day of the issue of the information as sworn. A preliminary Inquiry is forestalled from being a fishing expedition and cannot be used as such. This is a travesty while there is also no room to add to the file while the witness or accuser may be brought to the stand to give account to her accusation. Then, the evidence is assessed and any new evidence would have to be conflicting and contradictory with no probative value. The assessment during this Preliminary Inquiry or Deposition is to assess the fitness of the evidence for untrained triers of Fact known as the jury who will be asked whether they believe there is any finding of guilt in the consideration of the reasonable man in the criminal law, not in the Tort law, such that the accused's circumstances are considered in this assessment with the reasonable 5' 1'' Ethiopian taxi driver with an air gun who thought he was going to be robbed by rowdy and celebrating 6'8'' tall 10th generation Black High School or College basketball players and he just turns around and shoot everyone of them in the head while driving his Uber Honda on an arranged pick up. But where one is involved as a trier of fact in the criminal context , they must always ask themselves in assessing the behavior of the reasonable , just what the accused in the alleged circumstances would have considered the facts to be from his vantage point at 5' 3 '' tall as a former prisoner of an African dictator whose wife wants to believe that apostolic-ally, the soap on your bathroom counter has to be what she imagines as expensive white people uh milk! Ah ah...don't you know he will accuse you before you can save him from his own lack of de good credibility...don't you know? The tortious standard of the reasonable man does not assess the subjective outlook of the accused tortfeasor but a standard of reasonableness must be applied that is brought from the professional standards and expectations of a professional body or a standard understood to be that of the reasonably capable driver or pedestrian like Malfloata where a legal obligation to obey traffic by laws may also be relevant in assessing this reasonableness such that it would never be reasonable to cross the road where the cross walk is malfunctioning at night but it would have been reasonable to walk to the lights only 3 minutes away if you reasonably considered the value of your life on a snowy wet winter, cold and dark night where the lights were known to have been dysfunctional. You say 'What about Television and the 'Suits' TV show or what about Matlock?' But, Matlock's director knows the answer while Matlock is just a television character. The show was not designed for your salvation although there is a law that preserves your Habeus Corpus rights in spite of your belief in the power of the Punch and the bicep over the law but your current inability to remember that you have no right to harass anyone for his legal or library service and intellectual property that he not only defends as owned by him but also the intellectual property of others. He also creates and sells intellectual property as there is a law for your benefit and you will be glad that there are people who can insist on these laws for your big boy, Brock Lesknife benefit when you do forget although this mob psychology toward harassment has to be drug induced. No matter what, when it comes to systems of energy, rail roads, roads, engines and bridges in addition to law and economics , you will be students forever in certain parts of the world where the hot and cold Moen faucet showed up in the year 1500 on your Western Hemispheric Amerindian shores and once you had an African Dark Chocolate Truffle or a Black Burberry MAC, you can't go back and even so it does not forestall the right to be creative and redistributive which has its limits since it cannot cater to your belief in the right to do what you have to do to temper your feelings of jealousy after High School(you were right to get the social authority and Crown of Glory of an always brand new vehicle as a car sales man; Bling!That is what you wanted! ) with an understanding of certain immutable and final results that can never change lest the entire system is rendered redundant and unsafe to the point of no longer being habitable with negative population growth purely for economic reasons and also legal and lawless reasons. Law is not a human being's name. The initials LAW are not a symbol of Euro occupation or dominance. No; it is about you and your safety in any culture even if the entire country was a native reserve. It is law for personal safety and the safety of all property that includes native property.
This was written in honor of Brock Lesknife and his power to defend against a punch to his personal property and personal safety by calling 911. Warren did and they killed all the trespassers at his home in an on going investigation!
Comments
Post a Comment