Why don't you call the Nuclear power scientist or the Hydrogen fuel cell engineer or the levitating train designer a Yeshua. But at Letitating College, he is just an average Rabi.

Why don't you call the Nuclear power scientist or the Hydrogen fuel cell engineer or the levitating train designer a Yeshua. But at Letitating College, he is just an average Rabi.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

There was an argument concerning fuel and this future and they had a war to resolve it and also hide even momentarily certain technologies or discoveries to sell more fuel. But, today mobile phone companies generate more profit than the average fuel companies. Turn vehicles into mobile phones essentially in terms of overhead but keep the current average monthly cost of fuel the same. The cost of overhead of drilling and processing fossil fuels along with transportation is evident before you could even sell a gallon beside some coffee in a gas station. The production is very expensive and exceeds by 12 times the cost of producing 1 kpa. The cost of using water for algae also threatens our human future as water becomes an issue with a planet that will always be growing warmer as it moves closer to the sun very very slowly but surely over the centuries and millenniums. In the man time, airline fuels that plug and refill the ozone layer with a man made ozone chemical will help along with fewer and certainly unnecessary but very expensive fossil fuels. 'Eve's' or EV's should not have free municipal charging stations but they are not very efficient in terms of time and consumer usage when refueling and why isn't the charging absolutely regenerative for a battery that size with such limited range and is the battery absolutely recyclable. No; I have a better idea for 'Eve' and her environmental consciousness so we could just le them make their statement in protest bit longer about fuel and it is at least going in the right emotive direction although we could build anything for Eve that is much more to the point environmentally and technologically if you really want to recharge your drive-able epilady shaver with a cord which is essentially redundant but rather a cute vehicle or vehicles with plugs hanging off of them for now. The advertising was also quite intelligent; very intelligent. But, the vehicle I need or that we need already exists. Did you know the regenerative electricity generated in the the 2017 Civic with its electric motors on each wheel hub recharges its electric battery continuously and its battery is bigger than a LEaf battery and a Tesla battery but the vehicle does not need to stop and be plugged in. Regenerative vehicular transportation is here. It is very intelligent in giving us what we really want also; like basic income which is economically regenerative on the consumption side of an economy while automation addresses trillions of dollars saved in both labor costs and material costs in the avoidance of waste with better products. Going back to the regenerative vehicle, it also has a gasoline engine and obtained about 10 free energy electric kilometers for every 1 kilometer in driving. This is still feeding an industry; the fuel industry and there is still one step further. The vehicle I need should still feed an economy and industry; a fuel industry. So, the ideal notion is the fuel cell. Program the vehicle to operate for 700 kms on the electronically controlled full tank before refueling is required. The industry will also calculate equivalent earning per kpa of hydrogen or propane for a fuel cell or internal combustion fueled by non-liquid gas as they earn per litre or per gallon.

Post a Comment